Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Lowestoft Online Forum
Home Page
Community
Forum Index
Help Using Forum
Login
Register
Local Web Directory
Local News Headlines
Local Sport Headlines
About Lowestoft
Terms and Conditions
Contact Us
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search
Lowestoft Online
>
Community
>
General Community
>
Debating Chambers
> Topic:
Predictions for the future in 100 years??
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this board.
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
All
|
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Predictions for the future in 100 years?? (Read 744 times)
funkychick
Lowestoft Online Addict
Gender:
Posts: 14390
You may leave, but you'll return
Re: Predictions for the future in 100 years??
« Reply #20 Posted: 26 January 2012 at 10:09 PM »
Whahooooo Snowdrop for president I like your style I m all up for that
Logged
snowdrop
Lowestoft Online Addict
Posts: 4711
Re: Predictions for the future in 100 years??
« Reply #21 Posted: 27 January 2012 at 07:01 AM »
it b the party to end all parties anything goes aslong as i say what it is.i not sure i want see world end sobor
Logged
funkychick
Lowestoft Online Addict
Gender:
Posts: 14390
You may leave, but you'll return
Re: Predictions for the future in 100 years??
« Reply #22 Posted: 27 January 2012 at 08:08 AM »
Perhaps I ll review my post wanst meaning your party was thinking about your solar panelling idea
Logged
Mel
Lowestoft Online Addict
Gender:
Posts: 6477
Re: Predictions for the future in 100 years??
« Reply #23 Posted: 27 January 2012 at 09:16 PM »
Quote from: George27 on 26 January 2012 at 09:19 PM
In what way is nuclear power sustainable?
I apologise for that George27, sustainable wasn't the word to use I should have said ' I would much sooner see nuclear powered generators providing us with a more reliable source of energy (as opposed to wind turbines).
Logged
My Flickr Page
George27
Lowestoft Online Addict
Posts: 1490
Re: Predictions for the future in 100 years??
« Reply #24 Posted: 27 January 2012 at 09:57 PM »
No problem Mel. I agree with you, nuclear power would be more reliable. But the problem of the nuclear waste remains for future generations to deal with.
Logged
ATHEISM IS A NON-PROPHET ORGANIZATION
cyclelowestoft.blogspot.com
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
All
|
Go Up
Print
Admin options
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Site Stuff
-----------------------------
=> Site News and Announcements
=> Sport
=> Site Comments and Suggestions
=> Reception
-----------------------------
Strictly Lowestoft
-----------------------------
=> Lowestoft Weather
=> Debate Lowestoft Issues
=> Read All About It!
=> History Closet
=> Genealogy And Lost Friends
=> All About Lowestoft
=> Going Out in Lowestoft
===> Eating Out
===> Pubs & Bars
===> Public Conveniences in Lowestoft
=> Services & Tradesmen
-----------------------------
General Community
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> In the News
=> Debating Chambers
=> The Dark Room
=> Hobbies, Pastimes & Interests
=> Jokes and Trivia
=> Members Blogs
=> The I.T. Suite
-----------------------------
Help and Support
-----------------------------
=> Support Forum
=> Frequently Asked Questions
Powered by SMF
|
SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Loading...